A Brief History of Gravitational Theory

Sir Isaac Newton developed the first theory of gravitation. It was universal: it explained the motion of objects near the earth and the motion of the planets and moons. Using his theory, one could predict the trajectory of a cannon ball or the positions of the moon or any other celestial body. One only needed to know the initial conditions of the objects ... [Read more]

Does Evolution Imply Progress?

Evolution isn't about progress.  It is about species adapting to local environments.  If a mutation leads to a member of a species leaving more offspring with this mutation, then the mutation will spread through the local population, whatever the size of "local" is - it might be a few square miles or thousands of square miles - it depends on the species.... [Read more...]

Thoughts on a Definition of Science

Science is the effort to provide natural explanations of natural phenomena.  The truth of any scientific proposition rests ultimately upon how well it accounts for the observations it is trying to explain, and by how well it can predict the results of experiments and/or future observations. 

Mathematics is not a branch of science.  I think it has been called the handmaiden of science; not an appellation that would make any mathematician happy, I'm sure.  Much of theoretical physics is more math than science.  Until it connects with observation and explaining how the universe works, it has no direct scientific truth value (it is neither true nor false.  Heisenberg [I believe it was he] once remarked after listening to a paper being presented that the paper wasn't even wrong, meaning that the proposition being presented could not be falsified).  It may lead to valuable insights, and it might be a valuable reformulation of an existing theory; but if it makes no new predictions that can be tested and that differentiate it from existing theory, then either it is not a scientific proposition or it is not a new scientific proposition.