This blog provides background for and explanation of current topics in science.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

The Paleocene-Eocene Temperature Maximum (PETM)


Using a variety of temperature proxies, including the ratio of the different stable isotopes of carbon, 13C and 12C, where higher temperatures favor the lighter isotope, 12C and one would expect to see a negative δ13C. Another indicator is the negative δ18O > 1% present in foraminifera shells that grew both in the surface and deep oceanic waters that occurred during this same time period. Likewise, analyses of the foraminifera Mg/Ca ratio and ratios of particular organic compounds used for TEX861,2, a paleothermometer based on the composition of marine picoplankton, Crenarchaeota3. There is clear evidence of a massive injection of 13C-depleted carbon at the Paleocene-Eocene transition. First, the previously mentioned negative δ13C change in carbon compounds at this time, about 55 million years ago. Second, carbonate dissolution which indicates the acidification of the ocean that occurs when atmospheric CO2 increases. The source of this carbon dioxide is unknown. Massive volcanic activity might have been to blame, but there is no evidence of sufficiently large volcanic activity such as the ash and lava deposits one would expect. There are volcanic traps in Siberia that were formed about this time, but there that activity alone would not account for the volume necessary to account for the likely CO2 content in the atmosphere of over 1700 ppm (parts per million) at its peak. This is based on a base value of about 1000 ppm near the end of the Paleocene and an addition of about 3,000 GtC (gigatonnes of carbon). This amount of carbon was determined by taking into account the carbonate compensation depth (CCD), a value determined by the carbonate depletion of shallow ocean bottom cores.4 A comet or asteroid impact that caused continent-wide fires was considered and rejected because there is no layer of soot that has been found in ocean bottom cores as would be expected. Nor has a crater been found of the right age to account for this. A third possibility is that the large deposits of methane hydrate that exist on the deep continental shelves were destabilized and released. Methane hydrate is a single molecule of methane, CH4, enclosed in a "cage" of water molecules, H2O. This compound is only stable in a narrow range of temperatures and pressures. It would only have taken a small change in temperature or a physical disturbance of the water surrounding the methane hydrate to cause it to become unstable and release the CH4. Methane is 20X as effective as CO2 at retaining heat, so with a large release of methane, there would have been an immediate rapid surge in temperature. Methane decays over a period of about ten years to carbon dioxide which would then linger for over one hundred years, heating the atmosphere more slowly for a longer period of time. The total temperature of the ocean water, both shallow and deep was about 9<sup>o</sup>F,reaching 77<sup>o</sup>F in the surface waters near the poles.  There was virtually no ice anywhere on Earth at this time since the temperature had already been warm prior to the PETM.  The poles warmed more than the rest of the planet because with the lack of snow, the albedo increased, causing a larger temperature excursion.1

Save up to 90% on Used Textbooks at BarnesandNoble.com. Shop Now!The transition from the Paleocene epoch to the Eocene epoch Is marked by sharp decrease in the percentage of 13C, δ13C, dissolution of carbonate in all the ocean basins, the extinction of many terrestrial mammals, and foraminifera in the mud on the ocean floor (i. e., benthic).  It was also marked by the origin of several new mammalian orders, including primates, artiodactyls (even-toed ungulates), and perissodactyls (odd-toed ungulates). The δ13C and dissolution of carbonate indicate that the ocean experienced a geologically rapid acidification and temperature rise. The acidification strongly implies a rapid rise in the amount of carbon in the atmosphere. This increase occurred over a period of about 20,000 years, a rate that is about one-tenth of the rate of increase of CO2 that we have experienced during the past 150 years.
Humans are currently adding about 30 GtC annually. At this rate, anthropogenic carbon additions will equal what was released at the P-E boundary in 100 - 200 years, some 100 times faster than occurred 55 million years ago.1,5 because we have geologic evidence of what the climate was like during this P-E boundary time period, we have an idea of what the climate will be like in our near future if we continue on our current path. Periods of 100o temperatures in the North American Southwest will last for months around the clock. Drought will be longer and more frequent than now. Flooding will be worse in those areas that commonly flood. All the glaciers will melt, raising the sea level by about 200 feet - it was 220 feet higher at the P-E Boundary than it is now. Since there are vast stores of methane under the permafrost, if the permafrost melts, and that now seems inevitable, the released methane will just exacerbate the problem and hasten the warming. There are also large deposits of methane hydrate on the continental shelves that could be released if the ocean temperature exceeds the threshold.
Only broad features of the climate during the 150,000 year transition from the Paleocene to the Eocene until CO2 levels returtned to the levels of the late Paleocene after this large carbon dioxide excursion. One can hope that by further study, a more detailed understanding will be gained along with indications of how this scenario might be mitigated
  1. National Geographic, October 2011, pp. 90 – 109
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEX86
  4. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/08/petm-weirdness/
  5. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/how-do-we-know-that-recent-cosub2sub-increases-are-due-to-human-activities-updated/ 
Gaiam.com, Inc

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Scientist claims that he has created life-like cells based on metal

Lee Cronin at the University of Glasgow claims that he may have developed cell-like structures capable of adapting to changing environments.1 The materials that he has used to create what he calls iCHELLS (inorganic chemical cells) are known as polyoxometalates. These are compounds made with various metal atoms combined with oxygen (O) and phosphorous (P).  Tungsten (W) is the most common metal used.

One of the iCHELLs.
Image from NewScientist.com.
He creates large negatively charged ions of these metal oxides and creates a salt by mixing these ions with protons (positively charged hydrogen [H+]) or sodium (Na+).  He next injects a solution of this salt into a solution containing an organic salt with large organic cations (positive ions) and small anions (negative ions).  What results is a salt of the metal oxide anion with the organic cation that precipitates from the solution in the form of a small bubble-like structure.  He is able to manipulate the form of these structures to give them some of the characteristics of organic cell membranes such as selective permeability that will control what chemicals reside within the bubble.  He has created bubbles within bubbles to give the appearance of the internal structure of living cells.  He has attached photosensitive dyes to the iCHELLS which enabled them to mimic rudimentary photosynthesis, including the ability to split H2+ and O plus an electron (e-), an important step in the process.

It is during his current experiment, scheduled to run for seven months that he has given some indication that he has succeeded in modifying the iCHELLs so that they will adapt to the environment they are in.  The final results are still a few months away and the details have not yet been published.  Last year he also showed that polyoxometallates could serve as templates for self-replication analogous to how DNA and RNA operate.  Taken together, these could be good first steps toward creating artificial life.

Reproduction, self-repair, adaptation, growth, and evolution are all characteristics of single-celled and more complex life as we know it.  If Cronin is able to induce these iCHELLs to perform all three, would this constitute a new form of life?  It would seem to be.  If he is able to accomplish this, and it is not certain that he will, it would revolutionize our understanding of what life forms might be possible on other planets in our solar system and elsewhere in the universe.  It may expand the Goldilocks zone and drastically increase the possibility of finding other life.

1. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20906-lifelike-cells-are-made-of-metal.html